Vili. THE MEDIEVAL KINGDOMS OP CYPRUS AND .ARMENIA. (Oct. 26 and 29,1878.) I HOPE that I need not apologise for my choice of a subject. The events of the last two years can scarcely be called to mind without much misgiving, both as to the way in which they have been construed by contemporary readers, and as to the way in which they will be judged by history. I am not one of those who hold that the maintenance of an opinion contrary to their own belief, implies either moral delinquency or mental imbecility. I have been quite prepared to admit that two honest men, equally gifted and alike trying to be impartial, may come to diametrically opposite conclusions from the same, evidence. But it is sickening to see the policy of a statesman, still more to see the question of a fact, debated, maintained or contradicted, by advocates whose arguments are not based upon attempts to find out the truth, but are simply weapons of attack and defence. ' This is to be believed because it suits the party ; this is to be discredited because it would damage the party: this is true because Pericles has said it ; this is false, or why should Alcibiades, or Cleon, or whoever it may be, have called heaven and earth to witness that it is true ? ' It will be a good thing if, after so much that is disheartening in the popular treatment of great questions, even one little benefit may be secured. Whatever may be thought of the Anglo-Turkish Convention, on whatever grounds, moral or political, Ν 2